skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 134604 Find in a Library
Title: Hypnotically Enhanced Testimony: Has It Lost Its Charm?
Journal: Southern Illinois University Law Journal  Volume:15  Dated:(Winter 1991)  Pages:289-320
Author(s): B A Clemens
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 32
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Noting that the courts need to recognize the benefits of hypnosis and work to prevent the dangers, this comment discusses the use of hypnosis in law enforcement, reviews the four schools of thought evident in the State courts, considers both the recent decision of the Illinois Supreme Court on the issue and the outlook of the U.S. Supreme Court, analyzes the differing views in the State courts, and proposes suggestions for possible reform of the current law.
Abstract: All of the approaches to hypnotically enhanced testimony advocate, to some extent, a position inconsistent with the general trend in evidence that every individual is competent to be a witness. The legal community holds hypnosis to its own interpretation of the standard established in Frye when the court excluded the results of systolic blood pressure deception testing. Hypnosis passes in some states and fails in others. There is no question that hypnosis when used properly has significant utility in the judicial setting. Construction of the Frye test to require scientific accuracy, in place of refreshed recollection, defeats the utility of such evidence. The courts need to take an individual-inquiry approach to the admission of hypnotically enhanced testimony. 206 footnotes
Main Term(s): Law reform; Questioning under hypnosis
Index Term(s): Appellate court decisions; Court procedures; Illinois; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.