skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 134710 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Drug Testing and Pretrial Misconduct: An Experiment on the Specific Deterrent Effects of Drug Monitoring Defendants on Pretrial Release
Journal: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency  Volume:29  Issue:1  Dated:(February 1992)  Pages:62-78
Author(s): C L Britt III; M R Gottfredson; J S Goldkamp
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 17
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 88-IJ-CX-K003
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports on a test study that used data from Pima County and Maricopa County, Ariz., to determine whether or not drug testing and monitoring of defendants on pretrial release alters their drug use and chances for pretrial misconduct.
Abstract: In Pima County, the booking number was used as a reasonable approximation to randomness, and every third even-numbered case was assigned to the control group (pretrial drug release without drug testing). There were 153 subjects in the treatment group (received drug testing) and 78 in the control group. A second sample used 74 in the treatment group and 64 in the control group. The same type of study design was used in Maricopa County. There were 425 in the treatment group and 465 in the control group for one sample. Indicators of pretrial misconduct were failure to appear at case proceedings or an arrest for a new offense. The findings show that in two Pima County samples, there was only a slight reduction in the rate of pretrial rearrest, and there were no differences for failure to appear at trial. In Maricopa County, the first sample showed no difference in the rate of pretrial misconduct between the treatment and control groups. In the second sample, the monitored group had a higher rate of pretrial failure, contrary to expectations. Given these findings, the study concludes that it is not cost-effective to provide drug testing for pretrial releasees. 2 tables, 3 notes, and 11 references
Main Term(s): Drug testing; Pretrial procedures
Index Term(s): Arizona; Pretrial intervention
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.