skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 134717 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Decision-Making of the District Attorney: Diverting or Prosecuting Intrafamilial Child Sexual Abuse Offenders
Journal: Criminal Justice Policy Review  Volume:4  Issue:3  Dated:(September 1990)  Pages:249-267
Author(s): L A Fridell
Date Published: 1990
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 84-IJ-CX-0070
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Data from 221 client files of the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse (SACA) unit of the Sacramento District Attorney's Office were used in this study; the intrafamilial child sexual abused defendants were divided into those who were selected by SACA as appropriate for diversion referral and those charged with abuse who were not diverted.
Abstract: The diverted and non-diverted samples were compared across two sets of factors including variables related to the SACA diversion referral guidelines and offense, offender, and victim variables unrelated to those screening criteria. The findings in this study show a strong association between the stated diversion referral guidelines and the actual criteria used by the District Attorney's Office to select defendants for participation in the Sacramento County Child Sexual Abuse Treatment Program (CSATP). Almost 90 percent of the cases were correctly classified on the basis of five variables defendant-victim relationship, record of criminal behavior, record of violent criminal activity, evidence of mental or emotional disorder, and acknowledgement of responsibility). Some of the variation is explained by the groups, while some variation may reflect errors in measurement or unrecognized factors. State law and case law have reinforced the independence of the prosecuting attorney in determining which defendants will be diverted. The sole restraint upon the district attorney is that discretion must be exercised within constitutional bounds. The only factor that influenced the DA's referral decisions, that was not included in the formal guidelines, was whether or not the defendant was a permanent resident in the victim's household. 9 tables, 5 notes, and 14 references (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Child molesters; Prosecutorial diversion
Index Term(s): California; Sex offender treatment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.