skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 134783 Find in a Library
Title: Guilty Plea Discount: Rule of Law or Role of Chance?
Journal: Howard Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:31  Issue:1  Dated:(February 1992)  Pages:53-75
Author(s): P Robertshaw; A Milne
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 23
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This British study examines differences in sentencing for defendants who plead guilty and those convicted at trial in 60 Crown Courts over 2 years.
Abstract: The study found that approximately one in eight Crown Courts in five circuits were awarding more custodial sentences to those pleading guilty than for those convicted at trial (reverse differential). Multiple regression analysis (MRA) of four administrative variables showed overall the not-guilty-plea rate was significant; for remanded defendants other administrative variables were relevant. Clearly, in terms of the MRA there were deviant localities from both positive-differential and reverse-differential courts. To examine this further, the analysis used descriptive statistics, which show that the MRA significance is produced by a minority of courts; the majority of positive-differential and reverse-differential courts have much in common administratively. An examination of the administrative characteristics of all these courts found a paradox; positive-differential and reverse-differential courts rarely share administrative characteristics, but they also vary greatly within each group. The study considered whether there are further advantages for defendants opting for trial in the reverse-differential courts in terms of their acquittal rates. On this evidence the study was unable to account fully for the two modes of criminal process found. 32 tables, 3 notes, and 4 references
Main Term(s): Plea negotiations
Index Term(s): England; Foreign courts; Sentencing factors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=134783

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.