skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 134875 Find in a Library
Title: Fraud-on-the-Market Theory and Thinly-Traded Securities Under Rule 10b-5: How Does a Court Decide if a Stock Market Is Efficient?
Journal: Wake Forest Law Review  Volume:25  Issue:2  Dated:(1990)  Pages:223-251
Author(s): R Robinson
Date Published: 1990
Page Count: 29
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This legal commentary explores the boundaries of fraud-on-the-market theory as it applies to thinly traded stocks in a Rule 10b-5 action and discusses factors that lawyers and judges can use to analyze a security to determine whether it traded in an "efficient market."
Abstract: In an efficient market, all economically relevant public information about a security is quickly reflected in an unbiased manner in the security's price. False information deceives the market and affects a security's price. The Security and Exchange Commission's Rule 10b-5 states that it is unlawful for anyone to defraud, deceive, or make misrepresentations or omissions to any person in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. Early cases applying fraud-on-the-market theory in the Rule 10b-5 context did not dwell on the meaning of efficiency. More recent cases, however, have focused on the efficiency of a stock market as a broad spectrum. At one end of the spectrum is a heavily traded stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Fraud-on-the-market theory should apply to this type of security. All mechanisms for an efficient market are in place: numerous shareholders, active trading, public speculation in the stock, an active public relations department, many institutional investors, market makers, and analysts closely monitoring all activities. At the other end of the spectrum is a regionally traded company with relatively few shareholders who trade infrequently in an over-the-counter market. Fraud-on-the-market theory should not be available to a plaintiff alleging Rule 10b-5 fraud regarding this security. The plaintiff should be required to find another method for asserting reliance because the mechanisms are not in place for information to be efficiently processed. Obviously, there is a large gray area between the two ends of the spectrum in which courts will be faced with the difficult question of determining if a market is efficient. 207 footnotes
Main Term(s): Securities fraud
Index Term(s): Federal regulations; Securities and Exchange Commission
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=134875

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.