skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 134999 Find in a Library
Title: Seizures Under the Fourth Amendment: Let's Cut to the Chase
Journal: American Journal of Criminal Law  Volume:18  Issue:3  Dated:(Summer 1991)  Pages:289-318
Author(s): S M Kuzma
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 30
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reviews issues in U.S. Supreme Court cases that bear upon the definition of a "seizure" which requires reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed.
Abstract: The U.S. Supreme Court will have the opportunity in "Hodari" to settle a difficult problem in fourth amendment jurisprudence, i.e., whether "mere pursuit" of a suspect constitutes a "seizure" within the meaning of the fourth amendment, or whether there must be an acquisition of physical control of the suspect before fourth amendment scrutiny is triggered. The Court's approach in "Mendenhall" and "Royer," which determines whether a seizure has occurred by asking whether a reasonable person under the circumstances would have felt free to go, is the most lenient standard the Court should impose. It should not conclude that a person who flees or avoids police contact has, by definition, not been seized. Such a perspective fails to give due weight to the intimidating nature of police encounters and citizens' reasonable expectation that they will not be pursued by police absent some factual justification. The reasonable suspicion standard, currently in place, is already generous enough to permit effective law enforcement. The Court should also conclude that evidence discarded during an unjustified pursuit is presumptively the "fruit of the poisonous tree." 82 footnotes
Main Term(s): Search and seizure laws
Index Term(s): Fresh pursuit; Reasonable suspicion; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.