skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 135550 Find in a Library
Title: Selective Incapacitation: Does It Offer More or Less?
Author(s): S Gillers
Corporate Author: New York State Bar Assoc
New York State Bar Journal
United States of America
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 34
Sponsoring Agency: New York State Bar Assoc
Binghamtom, NY 13902
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Participants at an October 1983 retreat sponsored by the Council on Criminal Justice of The Association of the Bar of New York City examined the possible advantages and disadvantages of selective incapacitation, a policy of incarcerating career criminals for lengthy periods.
Abstract: Participants considered social science research indicating that a small proportion of offenders commit a large proportion of crimes and that it is possible to distinguish the high-rate serious offenders from the low-rate offenders on the basis of individual characteristics. They noted that concepts of selective incapacitation are reflected in part in current career criminal prosecution programs, in current sentencing, and in special felony offender laws. Nevertheless, participants expressed much skepticism about the ability of social scientists to identify future recidivists accurately. They also voiced concerns about the appropriateness of using employment history and juvenile records in making decisions regarding selective incapacitation, about the potential rate of inaccurate identifications of high-risk offenders, and about policies regarding low-rate violent offenders and high-rate nonviolent offenders. They concluded that the attractiveness of selective incapacitation varies with the availability of resources in that it has been advocated as a way of dealing with funding limitations. Footnotes and list of members of the Council on Criminal Justice
Main Term(s): Selective incapacitation
Index Term(s): Career criminal programs; Corrections policies; Criminality prediction; Habitual offenders
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=135550

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.