skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 135567 Find in a Library
Title: Malingering and the Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial (From Criminal Court Consultation, P 223-258, 1989, Richard Rosner, Ronnie B Harmon, eds. -- See NCJ-135552)
Author(s): N Goldstein
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 36
Sponsoring Agency: Plenum Press
New York, NY 10013
Sale Source: Plenum Press
233 Spring Street
New York, NY 10013
United States of America
Type: Survey
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The clinical, practical, and philosophical issues involved in determinations of malingering during the psychiatric evaluation of competency to stand trial are examined, based on the author's experience in Federal and State court systems and in inpatient and outpatient forensic settings as well as in jails.
Abstract: Malingering includes simulation and dissimulation as well as all forms of intentional noncooperation or resistance during criminal proceedings or during the psychiatric evaluation. Psychiatrists and administrators working with criminal defendants believe the percentage of malingerers to be significant at every level of the system and in all settings. Defendants have an intuitive understanding of how to malinger and often have researched the issue as well. Therefore, psychiatrists must explore and check all kinds of challenging and unpleasant behavior. Clues to malingering include isolated symptoms, body language, exaggerations of symptoms, and prior history of mental dysfunction or incompetence. Psychological evaluation can also aid the evaluation of the defendant's intellectual capacity, personality, and other mental functions. Determining malingering involves moral judgments, but psychiatrists are obligated to help society within their capabilities and identify and appropriately protect the genuinely impaired defendant. 57 references
Main Term(s): Competency to stand trial
Index Term(s): Forensic psychiatry; Malingering; Mentally ill offenders; Problem behavior; Psychological evaluation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.