skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 135578 Find in a Library
Title: Competency To Be Executed (From Correctional Psychiatry, P 121-143, 1989, Richard Rosner and Ronnie B Harmon, eds. -- See NCJ-135571)
Author(s): C B Casals-Ariet; H Bluestone
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 23
Sponsoring Agency: Plenum Press
New York, NY 10013
Sale Source: Plenum Press
233 Spring Street
New York, NY 10013
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter surveys a sampling of the literature from the disciplines that are grappling with concerns associated with a person's competency to be executed and identifies additional questions that must be addressed.
Abstract: The discussion first presents background facts on capital punishment and a summary of the research on the stresses of confinement. It then briefly reviews some aspects of the legal background pertinent to competency to be executed. Some views of the psychiatric community are examined as well as ethical questions. Almost every State, either by statute or through case law, requires that a person not be "insane" at the time of execution. The standard of competency typically used is similar to that used to determine competency to stand trial, with the additional requirement of an understanding of the crime and the punishment to be faced. A number of issues associated with competency determinations arise for the psychiatrists involved. The American Psychiatric Association has a standard that states "A psychiatrist should not be participant in a legally authorized execution." This raises the question as to when the psychiatrist who participates in execution competency proceedings becomes involved in the infliction of death. Also, once the finding of incompetency to be executed has been made, the State requires that the prisoner be treated. Appelbaum (1987) holds that a psychiatrist should not treat an incompetent death row prisoner unless the sentence is commuted to life imprisonment prior to the commencement of treatment. The authors of this chapter hold that psychiatrists should not participate in evaluations of competency to be executed under current conditions. 41 references
Main Term(s): Death row inmates; Psychological evaluation
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Forensic psychiatry; Professional conduct and ethics
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=135578

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.