skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 135655 Find in a Library
Title: Child Pornography and the Right to Privacy
Journal: Florida Law Review  Volume:43  Issue:2  Dated:(April 1991)  Pages:347-404
Author(s): J Quigley
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 58
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines the relationship between the right to privacy and State statutes prohibiting child pornography through an analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Osborne v. Ohio.
Abstract: In that decision, the court upheld an Ohio law prohibiting the in-home possession of child pornography for personal use. The evidence against Osborne was obtained through a search of his private library; previously an individual had the right to possess any communicative material in his home for personal use. The court broadened the definition of child pornography by permitting the States to regulate a wider range of written materials. Thus, the Osborne ruling significantly eroded the first and fourth amendment rights to free speech and privacy. These rights were limited because of the State's overriding interest in eliminating the use of children in pornographic materials. In Osborne, the court balanced the nature of the harm done to children against the effectiveness of a ban on private possession as a means of curbing the pornographic film industry. The author notes that the court's decision in Osborne places the U.S. below the level of privacy protection accepted at the international level and maintains that the scope of the court's exception to the first and fourth amendments may be difficult to confine. 415 notes
Main Term(s): Child Pornography; Right of privacy
Index Term(s): Freedom of speech; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.