skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 135700 Find in a Library
Title: International Cooperation in Recording Evidence for Use in Criminal Proceedings With Particular Reference to Singapore (From Report for 1989 and Resource Material Series No. 37, P 184-190, 1990 -- See NCJ-135691)
Author(s): F T C Kuang
Date Published: 1990
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders
Tokyo, Japan
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

United Nations Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders
26-1 Harumi-Cho, Fuchu
Tokyo,
Japan

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: Japan
Annotation: Singapore's experience in responding to requests from other countries for evidence to be recorded for use in those countries' criminal proceedings suggests the need for the United Nations to assume a major role in fostering cooperation among its member countries and coordinating the drafting of appropriate national laws on the subject.
Abstract: Singapore has two laws that enable its courts to record evidence for use in the criminal proceedings of other countries. These are the Extradition Act and the 1885 Evidence by Commission Act. During the last 10 years, Singapore has received 17 requests from other countries for such evidence to be recorded, with almost half coming in the past 2 years. The main types of offenses involved have been drug law offenses, breaches of banking and foreign exchange regulations, fraud, and forgery. A useful role for the United Nations would be to make its members aware of the availability and benefits of such evidence, encouraging more extensive usage, and coordinating and regulating its usage so that the evidence can be put to practical use in the requesting countries. The main objections to using such evidence are constitutionality, jurisdiction, and procedural differences in countries' legal systems. To overcome these objections, the United Nations could develop a draft code for national legislation on the subject. 10 reference notes
Main Term(s): Court relations; Extraterritorial jurisdiction
Index Term(s): Extradition; Foreign courts; Foreign laws; Interagency cooperation; International agreements; Singapore
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=135700

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.