skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 135760 Find in a Library
Title: Capital Punishment and Non-Capital Crimes: A Test of Deterrence, General Prevention, and System-Overload Arguments
Journal: Albany Law Review  Volume:54  Issue:3/4  Dated:(1990)  Pages:681-707
Author(s): W C Bailey; R D Peterson
Date Published: 1990
Page Count: 27
Type: Research (Theoretical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article explains and tests the theory that capital punishment statutes help to prevent the commission of noncapital felonies.
Abstract: The premise that the death penalty reduces noncapital crimes is based upon three arguments advanced by proponents of the death penalty: general prevention, deterrence, and the production of system overload. In sum, these arguments reason that the threat and application of capital punishment could reduce the number of noncapital offenses by providing moralizing and related educational functions, by deterring felonies that might result in felony murder, and by freeing criminal justice resources from the homicide problem (presumably reduced by capital punishment threats) and thereby increasing the certainty of punishment for other offenses. If these arguments are correct, there should be a significant inverse relationship between rates of serious felonies and both the level of use of the death penalty and the amount of publicity devoted to executions. To test this hypothesis, this study conducted a national monthly time-series analysis of the number of executions; the amount of execution publicity; and the rates of aggravated assault, forcible rape, robbery, burglary, larceny, and vehicle theft between 1976 and 1987. The analysis shows a significant inverse relationship between the amount and type of television coverage devoted to executions and the rates of assault, robbery, and burglary. Implications of the findings are discussed, and suggestions are offered for further research. 4 tables and 69 footnotes
Main Term(s): Capital punishment
Index Term(s): Aggravated assault; Burglary; Deterrence effectiveness; Rape; Robbery
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.