skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 135955 Find in a Library
Title: Electronic Monitoring: Another Fatal Remedy? (From Correctional Theory and Practice, P 97-115, 1992, Clayton A Hartjen and Edward E Rhine, eds. -- See NCJ-135949)
Author(s): J R Lilly
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 19
Sponsoring Agency: Nelson-Hall Publishers
Chicago, IL 60606
Sale Source: Nelson-Hall Publishers
111 North Canal Street
Chicago, IL 60606
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of recent experience with electronic monitoring of offenders in the United States notes the problems that have been encountered and recommends ways to avoid unanticipated and undesirable consequences that cause a deterioration in the condition that they were supposed to alleviate.
Abstract: Like corrections in general, electronic monitoring programs have expanded rapidly. However, some programs have been abandoned as a result of unprofitability, unreliability, start-up costs, or poor administrative organization. Research has not yet determined whether electronic monitoring is effective. Nevertheless, it is clear that house arrest and electronic monitoring have not yet reduced prison overcrowding, although a few programs report successes in this area. Other developments have included increased supervision fees paid by offenders despite lowered daily cost of monitoring equipment, union opposition, and corruption of public officials. In addition, opposition to electronic monitoring with home confinement has emerged. Legal issues are also receiving attention. Ways to prevent future problems include implementing sentencing guidelines that specify the conditions under which electronic monitoring is used for offenders, limiting electronic monitoring only to knowledge of the presence or absence of a person in the home, and requiring licensing of agencies operated for profit. 72 references
Main Term(s): Electronic monitoring of offenders
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Correctional reform; House arrest
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.