skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 135987 Find in a Library
Title: Bail Interviewing: A Case Study of a Cross-National Policy Transfer
Journal: International Criminal Justice Review  Volume:1  Dated:(1991)  Pages:21-34
Author(s): H L Schachter
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 14
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: There were two attempts by correctional officials in England and Wales to adapt bail interviewing procedures that had been pioneered by the Vera Institute in the United States.
Abstract: In the 1960's, the Vera Institute linked prison overcrowding to judges' use of high bail as a means of ensuring pretrial detention; the institute used interviews with defendants to get judges information on their community and family ties in order to secure more pretrial releases. In the 1970's the British Home Office, responding to criticism of the high rate of pretrial remand, asked Vera to adapt its bail work to the British context. However, the project failed, largely due to the opposition of the unionized National Association of Probation Officers to bail interviewing. In addition, bail interviewing had no natural bureaucratic constituency in England. In 1985, the Prosecution of Offenses Act created the Crown Prosecution Service and triggered a second attempt to introduce bail interviews in England and Wales. At this point, most prosecutors supported the idea of bail interviewing, and the organizational culture differences encountered during the first attempt at a cross-national policy transfer were overcome. 2 notes and 38 references
Main Term(s): Bail reform; Cultural influences
Index Term(s): Correctional interview training; England; Foreign courts; Probation officer attitudes; Wales
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=135987

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.