skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 136208 Find in a Library
Title: Mental Disorder in the Criminal Justice System (From Criminology: A Reader's Guide, P 225-236, 1991, Jane Gladstone, Richard Ericson, et al, eds. -- See NCJ-136200)
Author(s): C D Webster
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada
Sale Source: University of Toronto
Centre of Criminology
Toronto,
Canada
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: This essay analyzes how mental disorder is addressed in the criminal justice system, notably under Canadian law.
Abstract: Although the criminal law recognizes that it is unjust to commit to trial a person who is mentally unfit or who was insane at the time of an alleged offense, the criminal justice system has had difficulty in the determination of fitness, insanity, and dangerousness. The law is not precise in its definitions of mental disorder. Mental health professionals have been used as experts in the criminal justice system, but their definitions are also imprecise. These definitional problems have an impact at every stage of the criminal justice process. The use of particular clinical diagnoses is often influenced more by institutional pressures than by scientific and clinical criteria; for example, clinicians often use a diagnosis that will achieve the court disposition they favor. Dispositions also depend on the availability of custodial and treatment facilities. The definitional problems are exemplified in efforts to define and predict dangerousness. Due to institutional pressures, clinicians err on the side of caution by overpredicting dangerousness. This circumstance suggests the reform of dangerous-offender legislation and procedures, which are based on the assumption that medical professionals do have the ability to forecast behavior reliably and accurately. 56-item reading list
Main Term(s): Mentally ill offenders
Index Term(s): Canada; Competency to stand trial; Criminal intent; Dangerousness; Definitions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=136208

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.