skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 136261 Find in a Library
Title: Comparing the UCR and NCS Over Time
Journal: Criminology  Volume:30  Issue:1  Dated:(February 1992)  Pages:125-132
Author(s): D McDowall; C Loftin
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 8
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Menard disagrees with Blumstein, Cohen, and Rosenfeld who say that Uniform Crime Report (UCR) and National Crime Survey (NCS) data behave similarly over time, and this paper argues that such controversy is inevitable due to data limitations and problems in defining comparability.
Abstract: Annual UCR (1946-1989) and NCS (1973-1989) robbery and burglary rates have confidence intervals that assume large samples. Further, correlations between the two measures assume serially independent observations. Both of these assumptions are false, and little weight can be placed on the estimates. Most variations in UCR data occurred in the 1960's before NCS data collection began; in addition, NCS rates have a higher level and a larger variance than UCR rates. Despite differences in levels and variances, however, fluctuations in the two data sets follow remarkably similar time paths. The correspondence of time paths suggests that UCR and NCS data are more strongly related than their correlations imply. Given the data limitations and uncertainties in defining comparability, it is not surprising that the Blumstein research and Menard find many reasons to disagree. Differences between UCR and NCS data raise the possibility of substantial bias in one or both of the measures, and studies of the relation between the two data sources will likely continue. The current paper argues that identifying substantive differences is the most promising approach to understanding the relation between UCR and NCS rates and that adjustments to remove the differences will always be debatable. 14 references and 2 figures
Main Term(s): Crime Rate
Index Term(s): National crime surveys; Research methods; Uniform crime reporting
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.