skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 136375 Find in a Library
Title: Empirical Test of Social Control Theory
Journal: Journal of Quantitative Criminology  Volume:8  Issue:1  Dated:special issue (March 1992)  Pages:9-28
Author(s): J Junger-Tas
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 20
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Social control theory was tested using a random sample of about 2,000 juveniles between 12 and 18 years of age in the Netherlands.
Abstract: Data were collected by personal interviews based on a structured instrument. Delinquency was measured by self-report questions on seven typical youth offenses (property and violent). Questions were added on drug use, truancy, and running away from home, acts not considered offenses in Dutch juvenile penal law. A second test was performed 2 years later on a subsample of the original one, taking into account changes in the life situation with respect to the family, school, work, leisure, peers, and values associated with delinquency. Changes in social integration were measured over time and compared to the impact of official intervention in delinquency cases by police or prosecutors. Results demonstrated no impact of police or prosecutor intervention on later delinquency but did show a strong and inverse relation between changes in social integration and frequency of offending. Although delinquent peers approved of and supported delinquent behavior, juveniles did not join these groups by chance. Those who failed in conventional subsystems and did not get any rewards from them turned away from conventional groups and toward other marginal and deviant peers. This process was accelerated by such factors as truancy, spending leisure time in the streets, and running away. The best predictor of delinquency was not poor family functioning, but rather failure in school. The author concludes that the contribution of social control theory to understanding delinquent behavior is a major one. Research questions are contained in an appendix. 19 references, 6 tables, and 4 figures
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prediction; Social control theory
Index Term(s): Foreign juvenile delinquency; Juvenile delinquency factors; Netherlands
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=136375

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.