skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 136579 Find in a Library
Title: For Better or for Worse: Adultery, Crime and the Constitution
Journal: Journal of Family Law  Volume:30  Issue:1  Dated:(1992)  Pages:45-96
Author(s): M J Siegel
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 52
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Adultery is discussed with respect to States' historic and current criminalization of it, its current incidence and attitudes, and constitutional issues related to the right to privacy.
Abstract: Adultery is a crime in most of the United States and occurs in most American marriages. Nevertheless, the laws banning extramarital sex are not enforced, and we do not consider ourselves criminals for committing adultery. In fact, the United States Supreme Court has made privacy part of our criminal law, and acceptance of this right has become a virtual prerequisite for Senate confirmation to the Court. Adultery relates to the right to privacy in three ways: as a protected marital choice, as a relationship embraced by the freedom of association, and as an act protected by the individual's interest in sexual privacy. Nevertheless, States usually present three goals for their adultery laws: the prevention of disease and illegitimate children, the preservation of the institution of marriage, and the safeguarding of general community morals. However, the adultery laws do not appear to accomplish these goals; the judicial decisions reflect the view that individuals, and not the government, should make our most private, consensual choices. 275 footnotes
Main Term(s): Family offenses; Sex offenses
Index Term(s): Interpersonal relations; Right of privacy; Sexual behavior; State laws; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.