skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 136596 Find in a Library
Title: Why Punish?
Author(s): N Walker
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 187
Sponsoring Agency: Oxford University Press, Inc
New York, NY 10016
Publication Number: ISBN 0-19-289219-3
Sale Source: Oxford University Press, Inc
198 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
United States of America
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This analysis of justifications for punishment argues that the modern retributive theory of punishment has not solved the problems of the classical utilitarian approach and has indeed created new ones of its own.
Abstract: The discussion notes that punishment is an institution in almost every society, although its name varies according to the context. Punishment has seven basic features. It involves the infliction of something unwelcome to the recipient; the infliction is intentional; those who order it are viewed as having the right to do so; and the infliction results from an action or omission that infringes a law, rule, or custom. In addition, the recipient has acted voluntarily, the punisher offers a justification, and the punisher's belief determines whether the action is punishment. Punishment differs from vengeance in that punitive feelings are more disinterested and based on a breach of some law or code of conduct. British and American judges and policy makers have taken a mainly utilitarian view of punishment, but the recent movement toward just deserts has threatened this approach. Compromises have been proposed to reconcile the two approaches. Both sides should compromise, with utilitarians accepting proportionality and retributivists giving up the assumptions that their approach is more moral and that retributive feelings must lead to action. Chapter notes, reference lists, and index
Main Term(s): Punishment
Index Term(s): Just deserts theory; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=136596

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.