skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 136614 Find in a Library
Title: Implied Malice: What Does the Future Hold?
Journal: Criminal Justice Journal  Volume:13  Issue:1  Dated:(Winter 1991)  Pages:59-80
Author(s): T Cristy
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 22
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The California Supreme Court has ruled that a person may be charged with murder under the concept of implied malice in situations where he was not only aware that his activity, for example, drunk driving, created a highly probable risk of death, but also ignored that recognition.
Abstract: Because implied malice does not specifically define the activities which would constitute murder, the courts have had discretion in determining whether the risk is excessive and the conduct culpable. This has resulted in some ambiguity in the meaning of implied malice and has blurred the line between murder and manslaughter. This article explores the meaning of malice, its historical development, and how its presence is detected in a defendant's conduct. The second part of the article examines the court's efforts to construct a standard by which some measure of specificity can be applied to each incident. The author concludes that there are three, viable options for dealing with cases which involve volitional, but unintended killing: the court may assess the degree of liability on a case-by-case basis, the legislature could pass a statute listing the types of conduct which qualify as implied malice, or the legislature could adopt the model Penal Code's "extreme reckless indifference to the value of human life" standard. 102 notes
Main Term(s): Criminal intent; Legal liability
Index Term(s): California; Murder; Risk taking behavior; State supreme courts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.