skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 136691 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Destigmatizing the Innocent Defendant: Rehabilitating Reputation After an Assault Under Color of Law
Journal: Criminal Law Bulletin  Volume:28  Issue:2  Dated:(March-April 1992)  Pages:116-136
Author(s): H M Friedman
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 21
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: As a means of destigmatizing a defendant who has been acquitted, this article calls for a new jurisprudence of reputation.
Abstract: The operative realities of the current criminal justice system facilitate arbitrary impairment of a defendant's reputation by government. The mass media report widely on prosecutors' statements regarding arrests and upcoming trials. Prosecutors' access to the media, coupled with public interest in crime, sets the stage for reputational injury. The publicity that often surrounds investigations and arrests impairs reputation before any hearing is held. Prosecutorial domination of the grand jury process has substantially reduced the role of the grand jury in the protection of the innocent. Extended criminal trials often severely injure the defendant's reputation, even if there is ultimately an acquittal. The author proposes a new jurisprudence of reputation that places two obligations on the government when a defendant is acquitted. First, when a person who has been officially and publicly charged with a crime is acquitted or has charges dropped, prosecutors should be precluded from making contemporaneous public statements that suggest the defendant is guilty of the crime although it was not proven to the court. The government should also have an affirmative duty to remedy the injury to reputation caused by the public allegations of criminality. 85 footnotes
Main Term(s): Acquittals
Index Term(s): Media coverage; Pretrial publicity
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.