skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 136780 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Punishment, Accountability, and the New Juvenile Justice
Journal: Juvenile and Family Court Journal  Volume:43  Issue:1  Dated:(1992)  Pages:1-9
Author(s): M L Forst; D Crim; M E Blomquist
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The juvenile justice system has undergone radical change in the past three decades and is currently struggling to clarify its philosophy, but the lack of clarity of the emerging concepts has resulted in a lack of consensus regarding the nature and purpose of the new approach to juvenile justice.
Abstract: The procedural changes that began with the Gault decision has more recently evolved into a substantive revolution. The most significant change has been in the apparent demise of the rehabilitative ideal. New theories or models have emerged that incorporate terminology such as punishment, justice, and accountability into State juvenile codes and the vocabulary of juvenile justice personnel. However, these concepts have not been clearly defined, and the philosophical debate may merely be a guise to cover the underlying political and social agenda based on the public's desire for vengeance and public protection. 53 reference notes (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice reform; Punishment
Index Term(s): History of juvenile justice; Juvenile delinquency prevention
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.