skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 137044 Find in a Library
Title: Searches and Seizures of Cars and Containers
Author(s): S Decoster; W Jeronimus; R A Stanich
Corporate Author: Minnesota Office of the Attorney General
United States of America

Minnesota Cty Attorneys Assoc
United States of America
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 33
Sponsoring Agency: Minnesota Cty Attorneys Assoc
St Paul, MN 55104
Minnesota Office of the Attorney General
St Paul, MN 55155
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report discusses the United States Supreme Court decisions and Minnesota judicial decisions that regulate the authorization of searches and seizures of cars and containers in Minnesota.
Abstract: Every search and seizure question involves two types of issues. The first is whether the circumstances perceived by the police officer justify the particular intrusion, whether it be an investigative stop, a frisk, a full search, or other intrusion. The second issue is whether, before making the intrusions, the police officer met the warrant requirement. This second issue requires the investigating officer to make a decision regarding how to proceed. If any doubt exists regarding the legitimacy of proceeding without a warrant, the officer can and should seek consent for the search or, if circumstances permit, obtain a warrant. Police officers considering warrantless searches of vehicles should be familiar with the legal requirements for probable-cause searches, searches incident to an arrest, and inventory searches. Searches of containers should be governed by judicial decisions starting with United States v. Ross in 1982. List of cases
Main Term(s): Search and seizure laws
Index Term(s): Investigative powers; Minnesota; Police legal limitations; Traffic law enforcement training; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=137044

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.