skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 137258 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: General Effect of Mandatory Minimum Prison Terms
Author(s): B S Meierhoefer
Corporate Author: Federal Judicial Ctr
United States of America
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 30
Sponsoring Agency: Federal Judicial Ctr
Washington, DC 20002
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This research provides an overview of how Federal sentencing has changed from January 1984 through June 1990, a period which saw the proliferation of statutory mandatory minimums and the promulgation of sentencing guidelines.
Abstract: Although there are many mandatory minimum statutes, those with the greatest impact on Federal sentencing are for drug trafficking offenses that involve large amounts of drugs and possession or use of a firearm during a drug trafficking felony or a violent crime. This research focuses on sentences for these two types of offenses. The study concludes that mandatory minimum sentence laws contribute to increased sentence length. Mandatory minimum sentences and the sentencing guidelines have also apparently narrowed the difference in the sentences imposed for equally serious offenses that involve marijuana and opiates. Another effect has been a reduction in the importance of age and the distinction between leadership and middleman roles in the sentencing decision. In all instances, the narrowing of differences stems from more severe sentencing of the previously advantaged group. Mandatory minimum sentence laws have not ensured that all of those involved in the proscribed behaviors receive at least the minimum term; just under one-half of those who would apparently be eligible received lesser sentences. Despite the laws' emphasis on offense behavior, sentences still vary by offender characteristics; the least culpable offenders and female offenders continue to receive less severe sentences than others involved in similar offenses. Both black and Hispanic offenders now receive noticeably more severe sentences than their white counterparts. 16 figures, 2 tables, and a statistical appendix
Main Term(s): Mandatory Sentencing
Index Term(s): Federal courts; Longitudinal studies; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing trends
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.