skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 140832 Find in a Library
Title: Procedural Justice and Culture
Journal: International Journal of Psychology  Volume:27  Issue:2  Dated:(April 1992)  Pages:227-242
Author(s): E A Lind; P C Earley
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 16
Type: Survey (Cross-Cultural)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This article discusses the implications of procedural justice research for traditional exchange-theory concepts and for the distinction between collectivistic and individualistic cultures in cross-cultural psychology.
Abstract: A review of procedural justice research reveals serious shortcomings in the exchange theories that have traditionally dominated Western analyses of the social psychology of groups. Results of a number of studies conducted in the United States and Western Europe indicate that individualistic, self-interest-based models of human behavior are insufficient to explain the phenomena of procedural justice. Instead, procedural-justice effects often reveal strong group-oriented concerns and motivations even in cultural contexts generally thought to be characterized by individualistic orientations. The research literature also indicates that if a group's procedures are judged to be fair, people are more likely to show group- oriented behavior and to hold more favorable attitudes toward the group and its leaders. These findings have led to the development of a theory of justice judgments--the Lind and Tyler group-value theory--which is based on group norms and relations rather than on social-exchange theory. The authors describe a general model of social behavior that integrates group-oriented and individually oriented behavior, and they discuss the implications of the model for social and cross-cultural psychology. 1 figure, 3 tables, 39 references, and an article abstract in French
Main Term(s): Criminal procedures
Index Term(s): Cultural influences; Social psychology
Note: From a special issue entitled, "Social Psychological Approaches to Responsibility and Justice: The View Across Cultures."
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=140832

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.