skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 141421 Find in a Library
Title: Does Patrol Prevent Crime? The Minneapolis Hot Spots Experiment
Author(s): L W Sherman; D Weisburd
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 16
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 88-IJ-CX-009
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The Minneapolis Hot Spots Experiment assessed the impact of police patrolling on crime prevention and tried to compensate for design problems in previous studies, notably inadequate sample size, no measurement of patrol intensity, and dispersal of patrol units over too broad a low-crime area.
Abstract: This study used a sample size of 110, with 55 hot spots in each treatment group; it measured patrol presence through officer records and research staff observation; and it concentrated the experiment in the highest crime hot spots in Minneapolis. The preliminary analysis showed that extra patrolling can make a difference in the rate of crime occurring in a specific hot spot, although most of the time, routine patrol levels may only produce a modest reduction in crime. Future study is needed to determine whether greater increases in patrols would yield greater reductions in crime. Patrol increases can provide a kind of residual deterrence, preventing crime and disorder from occurring in hot spots even after the police are gone. 3 notes and 21 references
Main Term(s): Crime patterns; Patrol
Index Term(s): Crime prevention officers; Minnesota
Note: Presented at the International Society of Criminology Course, "Urban Crime Prevention," Tokyo, Japan, April 15, 1992.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.