skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 142003 Find in a Library
Title: Effective Case Monitoring and Timely Dispositions: The Experience of One California Court
Journal: Judicature  Volume:76  Issue:5  Dated:(February-March 1993)  Pages:254-257
Author(s): M L Goodman
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 4
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In January 1991, the Orange County (California) Superior Court implemented a case monitoring system known as Differential Case Management (DCM), which replaced the Expedited Trial Program (XTP). A primary goal for both programs was to meet the time standards for case disposition set by the American Bar Association: 90 percent of general civil cases within 12 months of filing, 98 percent within 18 months, and 100 percent within 24 months.
Abstract: Disposition trends were measured for all DCM cases filed in January 1991, based on data collected a year later. The DCM trends were compared with those for cases filed under XTP during January of 1988, 1989, and 1990. The disposition results showed a disparity between the two systems, with the DCM system rating far lower than that of the XTP. One explanation for the difference was the inclusion of personal injury cases in the new case management program. DCM also suffered from an inadequate case tracking system, while in XTP, effective case monitoring was the rule, rather than the exception. The results showed that the evaluation system used in DCM, like the XTP 90-day conference, was the court's most powerful management tool in early case disposition. This author argues that the primary obstacle to DCM's success was legislation that mandated inefficient case management techniques. 5 figures
Main Term(s): Computer aided operations; Court case flow management
Index Term(s): California; Dispositions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=142003

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.