skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 147925 Find in a Library
Title: IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE ELICITED FROM CHILDREN USING CUED RECALL
Journal: Police Journal  Volume:67  Issue:1  Dated:(January-March 1994)  Pages:46-52
Author(s): K Telfer; J Baxter; G Hutcheson; D Warden
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 7
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Recent amendments to British law allow video recordings of initial interviews with children to be used as evidence in court.
Abstract: Published recommendations for interviewing children have advocated the use of general, open-ended questions wherever possible to elicit the most accurate statements. However, research has shown that young children questioned in this manner are unlikely to reveal all the relevant information they know. For 5- and 6-year-olds, cued recall may be the best method for conducting interviews. Care must be taken not to use cues that might suggest answers and contaminate the evidence. However, interviewers can encourage children to be forthcoming by using nonsuggestive visual feedback. This method allows interviewers to explain the purpose of the interview to the child, encourage the child to give narrative answers, make the child aware of what the interviewer knows, provide a focus for the child's attention, and encourage the use of memory retrieval techniques. 24 references
Main Term(s): Victims of Crime
Index Term(s): Courts; Evidence collection; Great Britain/United Kingdom; Interview and interrogation; Juvenile witnesses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=147925

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.