skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 147972 Find in a Library
Title: IMPACT OF NEW SENTENCING LAWS ON STATE PRISON POPULATIONS IN PENNSYLVANIA, FINAL REPORT
Author(s): W Bell; D Kahn; R Lawson; S Szydlo
Corporate Author: Carnegie Mellon University
School of Urban and Public Affairs
United States of America
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 103
Sponsoring Agency: Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document contains the results of research into the impact of new sentencing laws on State prison populations in Pennsylvania.
Abstract: Researchers first examined current sentencing practice in Pennsylvania to determine how actual sentences compared to sentences specified in legislative proposals. They then developed a methodology to provide, for any sentencing proposal, estimates of the impacts of proposals in terms of: (1) total number of offenders sent to State prisons; (2) types of offenders sent to State prisons; (3) costs of housing the resulting State prison populations. Analysis showed that mandatory minimum sentencing legislation could have very large and costly impacts on the State prison system. These impacts would not result from the imposition of stiff penalties for the most serious offenses, but from the commitment to State prisons of large numbers of the least serious offenders. Furthermore, judges who found the mandatory minimum sentences too stringent might well respond to the sentencing mandates in ways (such as acquittal) that would defeat the intent of the legislation. Therefore, in view of the substantial problems associated with mandatory minimum sentences, alternative ways of improving sentencing practices should be developed. Footnotes, appendixes, tables, figures
Main Term(s): Corrections
Index Term(s): Courts; Pennsylvania; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=147972

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.