skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 148014 Find in a Library
Title: INSANITY PLEA IN THE CASE OF A SERIAL KILLER
Journal: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology  Volume:38  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring 1994)  Pages:3-16
Author(s): G B Palermo; R D Knudten
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 14
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In Anglo-Saxon countries, the concept of individual responsibility has been central and basic to social stability.
Abstract: The M'Naghten rule, which introduced the concept of the insanity plea in 1843, was based on the idea that certain people possessed a mental defect that made them unable to apprehend the consequences of their actions. The Durham rule attempted to add the notion of disease or mental infirmity to the legal concept of insanity. Finally, the legal definition of the American Law Institute (ALI) asked whether the defendant lacked substantial appreciation of his behavior and capacity to conform to legal requirements. This evolution has progressed in parallel to neuropsychological discoveries regarding various brain functions. An examination of Jeffrey Dahmer, an accused (and later convicted) serial killer revealed that he suffered from a severe personality disorder, characterized by antisocial, obsessive-compulsive, sadistic, fetishistic, and necrophilic features. His emotional conflicts were embedded in his personality structure and were not amenable to common psychotherapeutic or pharmacologic intervention. The jury convicted the defendant, convinced that he was legally sane when he committed the crimes of which he stood accused. 1 note and 19 references
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Criminal responsibility; Criminology; Insanity defense; Serial murders
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=148014

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.