skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 148431 Find in a Library
Title: Severity of Penalty, Seriousness of the Charge, and Mock Jurors' Verdicts
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:18  Issue:2  Dated:(April 1994)  Pages:189-202
Author(s): J L Freedman; K Krismer; J E MacDonald; J A Cunningham
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 14
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports the results of a number of experiments designed to explore the effect of severity of penalty and seriousness of charge on verdict.
Abstract: The results from this series of four experiments showed no indication that mock jurors are less likely to vote guilty when the penalty is more severe. In several experiments, the jurors' assessment of how harsh or lenient the sentences were relative to the seriousness of the crime suggested that they understood both the charges and sanctions. The range of penalties used in these experiments ranged from a few years' imprisonment to life. The findings indicate that as long as the amount of evidence legally required for conviction does not change, the likelihood that jurors will vote guilty is affected neither by the seriousness of the charge nor by the severity of the penalty. 4 tables and 7 references
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Jury decisionmaking; Sentencing factors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=148431

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.