skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 148643 Find in a Library
Title: Continuing Barriers to Women's Credibility: A Feminist Perspective on the Proof Process
Journal: Criminal Law Forum  Volume:4  Issue:2  Dated:(1993)  Pages:327-354
Author(s): K Mack
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 28
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article draws upon social-psychological research and task force reports on gender bias in the courtroom to argue that women witnesses lack credibility for many judges.
Abstract: The specific problem upon which the article focuses on the need for corroboration facing women who testify about rape. Harsh corroboration warnings, given by trial judges with the approval of appellate courts, are based on the same false beliefs about women's credibility that led in the past to mandatory warnings. The feminist perspective put forth here holds that the law's lack of belief in women's testimony is a direct manifestation of the overall problem of male dominance. In addition to societal barriers to women's credibility in the courtroom, common law has developed a set of rules specifically to attack the credibility of women testifying about sexual assault, including rules related to the expectation of a recent complaint, the relevance of sexual history, the requirement of force or other forms of resistance, and the need for corroboration. Reform must be pursued on several fronts: improving particular rules and passing legislation, addressing the gender-biased context in which substantive and procedural rules operate, and educating players in the legal system. 124 notes
Main Term(s): Victims of Crime
Index Term(s): Courts; Sex discrimination; Sexual assault victims; Witness credibility; Women's rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=148643

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.