skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 148652 Find in a Library
Title: Impact of Policing on Social Disorder: Summary of Findings
Author(s): W G Skogan
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 36
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 92-IJ-CX-0008
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study assessed the impact of several special policing programs on social disorder.
Abstract: Social disorder is signaled by bands of teenagers skipping school and congregating on street corners, prostitutes and panhandlers soliciting for attention, public drinking, vandalism, the verbal harassment of women on the street, street violence, and open gambling and drug use. The types of police programs evaluated were home visits, which gather information about neighborhood problems from citizens who have not called the police; police storefront offices, which provide a locus for decentralized neighborhood- oriented police programs; foot patrols; intensive enforcement that involved "street sweeps;" and multiprogram efforts that involved combinations of community policing and intensive enforcement efforts. In almost every case, the programs described were evaluated with a quasi-experimental research design. Each program was conducted in a different area, while another matched area was designated as a comparison area where no new policing programs were instituted. Surveys of residents were conducted in the target and comparison areas before and after the programs had been operating for a period that ranged from 10 months to 2 years. A variety of other kinds of data were collected as well. This report draws together some of the evaluation data and describes a new analysis that combines the results in one "meta-evaluation" of the programs. Findings show that two community policing strategies--door-to-door visits and storefront offices--were significantly associated with lower levels of social disorder. On the other hand, exposure to intensive enforcement programs and foot patrol was associated with higher levels of social disorder afterward, compared to the other areas. Differential impact of the programs is examined by the race of the respondents in the evaluations. Technical appendix, tables, and 20 references
Main Term(s): Police effectiveness
Index Term(s): Community policing; Foot patrol; Policing innovation; Public order offenses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.