skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 148886 Find in a Library
Title: How Do States Determine the Need for Judges?
Journal: State Court Journal  Volume:17  Issue:3  Dated:(Summer/Fall 1993)  Pages:3- 11
Author(s): V E Flango; B J Ostrom; C R Flango
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
State Justice Institute
Alexandria, VA 22314
Grant Number: SJI-92-05C-B-158
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Various methodologies and criteria are used to determine the need for judicial positions in State courts, and this article highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly used measures and criteria in 1992.
Abstract: Case-related direct measures include case filings and active pending cases, while case-related indirect measures include number of dispositions, manner of dispositions, and case processing time. Noncase-related criteria, or surrogate measures, concern the use of outside judicial assistance, population size or growth, number of attorneys, and travel time. The authors contend that the best direct measure of the demand for court services and consequently the need for judicial positions is the number of weighted case filings. Because cases vary in complexity and in the amount of judge time required to process, some States weight some cases more than others. The basic idea of case weighting involves determining the total time required to hear all cases, the amount of time the typical judge has available, and the number of judges needed (determined by dividing the time required to hear cases by the judge time available). Other considerations in the use of both quantitative and nonquantitative criteria to determine the need for judicial positions in State courts are discussed. 11 notes and 3 figures
Main Term(s): State courts
Index Term(s): Case management; Case processing; Caseload management; Court case flow management; Court statistics; Dispositions; Judges; State-by-state analyses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=148886

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.