skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 148984 Find in a Library
Title: Judicial Racism (From Aboriginal Justice Issues, P 117- 134, 1993, Sandra McKillop, ed. - See NCJ-148980)
Author(s): C Cunneen
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 18
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Institute of Criminology
Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia
Sale Source: Australian Institute of Criminology
GPO Box 2944
Canberra ACT, 2601,
Australia
Type: Conference Material
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: This paper examines patterns of racial discrimination in judicial sentencing in Australia and analyzes remedial efforts.
Abstract: The limited empirical studies of judicial racial bias in Australia do not show overt general patterns of unfavorable discriminatory sentencing of Aboriginal offenders. The fact that Aboriginal defendants appear in disproportionate numbers before the courts is not due to judicial decisionmaking but rather to police decisionmaking. Consideration of criminal history in sentencing also places Aboriginal offenders at a disadvantage because of their more frequent contacts with the criminal justice system. There are, however, many individual cases of direct judicial racial discrimination in sentencing that have been well publicized. One of the major Royal Commission recommendations in its review of a particular case of discriminatory sentencing of a female Aboriginal offender was that judicial officers should be trained in Aboriginal culture and related criminal justice issues. It is unrealistic to expect, however, that such limited training will enable non-Aboriginal judicial officers to reflect Aboriginal culture in their decisionmaking. A more realistic approach is to assert the principles of self-determination and the right for indigenous people to develop their own justice mechanisms. A 34-item bibliography
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Aborigines; Judicial discretion; Racial discrimination; Sentencing disparity
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=148984

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.