skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149350 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Ethical and Legal Duties in Conducting Research on Violence: Lessons From the MacArthur Risk Assessment Study
Journal: Violence and Victims  Volume:8  Issue:4  Dated:(Winter 1993)  Pages:387-396
Author(s): J Monahan; P S Appelbaum; E P Mulvey; P C Robbins; C W Lidz
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Chicago, IL 60603
National Institute of Mental Health
Bethesda, MD 20852
Grant Number: MH 49696-01; MH40030-06
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article addresses the ethical and legal duties that must be confronted in any study of the risk of interpersonal violence in the community.
Abstract: As an illustration, the article examines the MacArthur Risk Assessment Study, which is researching the markers of violence among released mental patients. Methods by which the researchers are discharging their legal and ethical duties are described and justified. Strategies center around the duty to protect research subjects from their own violence and the duties to protect research staff and third parties from subjects' violence. The discussion focuses on ethical codes and legal duties. Topics addressed in the review of legal duties include suicidal behavior, third- party injury, and research staff injury. A description of specific procedures to protect subjects and third parties focuses on clear consent, a "chain of command," a hierarchy of interventions, and written documentation. A discussion of procedures to protect research employees addresses staff training, case screening, and a secure research environment. 21 references
Main Term(s): Statistics
Index Term(s): Court procedures; Criminology; Human research subject protection; Professional conduct and ethics; Research methods; Violence
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.