skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149381 Find in a Library
Title: Grooming and Weight Standards for Law Enforcement: The Legal Issues
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:63  Issue:7  Dated:(July 1994)  Pages:27-32
Author(s): W U McCormack
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Many law enforcement agencies have policies or regulations rearding officer grooming, uniform, and dress, and officers who challenge these policies or regulations face certain constitutional and Federal statutory issues.
Abstract: Since the 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kelley v. Johnson, courts have shown deference to grooming standards challenged on constitutional grounds. This decision ruled that the police department in question demonstrated a rational connection between its grooming regulation and personal and property safety and that the regulation did not violate due process protections. Even though courts generally give wide latitude to law enforcement agencies with respect to grooming and dress codes, they must ensure that restrictions do not violate fundamental constitutional rights. Grooming standards have generally been upheld when challenged on constitutional grounds, but certain grooming standards implicate protections provided by statutes designed to prevent race, gender, or handicapped discrimination. For example, prohibitions on beards have been challenged by black males who suffer from a medical condition called pseudofolliculitis barbae. Another challenge raised in grooming code cases involves potential gender discrimination, since men are often governed by one standard and women by another. Law enforcement agencies have maximum body weight standards for both safety and physical fitness reasons. Mandated weight standards have encountered varied court interpretations when challenged on the basis that they violate the Americans With Disabilities Act or the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The author concludes that police grooming standards will be upheld when challenged on a constitutional basis as long as there is a legitimate, nonarbitrary reason for the standards. 33 endnotes
Main Term(s): Police standards
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Discrimination; Police legal limitations; Police policies and procedures; Uniform clothing; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.