skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149397 Find in a Library
Title: How Minority Judges Fare in Retention Elections
Journal: Judicature  Volume:77  Issue:6  Dated:(May-June 1994)  Pages:316-321
Author(s): R C Luskin; C N Bratcher; C G Jordan; T K Renner; K S Seago
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 6
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article provides statistical impressions of the prospects of minority judges in retention elections, based on an analysis of data from every judicial retention election in the United States between 1980 and 1990.
Abstract: Data address election returns, other aspects of a State's selection system, the judge's race and gender, and constituency characteristics. Traditionally, judges initially selected on merit by governors and then subsequently presented to citizen voters in a retention election after having served on the bench for a term retain their judgeships. The current study shows this principle to be roughly as true for African-American and Hispanic judges as for white judges. Hispanic judges may be rejected at slightly higher rates than their African-American or white colleagues, but even they are retained 96 percent of the time. The small number of minority judges who have lost retention elections over the past decade have apparently lost their judgeships for reasons other than minority status. The authors conclude that the absence of proportionate numbers of minority judges under a retention election system is due more to the initial merit selection process rather than to the retention elections. 3 tables and 38 notes
Main Term(s): State courts
Index Term(s): Judge selection; Judicial elections; Minority judges
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.