skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149462 Find in a Library
Title: Counsel for the Poor: The Death Sentence Not for the Worst Crime but for the Worst Lawyer
Journal: Yale Law Journal  Volume:103  Issue:7  Dated:(May 1994)  Pages:1835-1883
Author(s): S B Bright
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 49
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Despite the U.S. Supreme Court Powell decision, entitling indigent defendants facing the death penalty to a court- appointed lawyer, and the Gideon decision, reaffirming the importance of competent counsel, poor people accused of capital crimes are often defended by lawyers who lack the skills, resources, and commitment to properly handle their case.
Abstract: This article argues that arbitrary results, particularly in capital cases, often result from inadequacy of counsel. The pervasive inadequacy of counsel for the poor stems from the lack of a functioning adversary system in the U.S., the lack of indigent defense programs, the lack of compensation for court-appointed lawyers, the role of judges in appointing and overseeing mediocrity and incompetence, and the system's tolerance for a minimal standard of legal representation. The author maintains that members of the judiciary and the bar have failed to keep the promise of Gideon and, as a result, the situation has deteriorated so that the right to counsel for poor people has been further eroded. The situation can only be remedied through the response of individual lawyers and the imposition of limits on the power of the courts to appoint incompetent counsel. 242 notes
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Attorney competence; Capital punishment; Court appointed counsel; Criminology; Indigents
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.