skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 149571 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Is Voting for State Judges a Flight of Fancy or a Reflection of Policy and Value Preferences?
Journal: Justice System Journal  Volume:16  Issue:3  Dated:(1994)  Pages:57-71
Author(s): N P Lovrich Jr; C H Sheldon
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 15
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the 1988 race for an open seat on the Oregon Supreme Court to determine whether voters responded thoughtfully and rationally in their choices for the seat.
Abstract: The simultaneous presence of the Bush-Dukakis race for the Presidency and the mandatory prison term and gay rights initiatives provided an opportunity to test whether judicial voters were motivated by ideology. Specifically, the analysis considered whether conservatives and liberals, as identified by votes in the presidential race and on the two initiatives, carried their ideological preferences over to the judicial race. As a further check on the analysis, the study considered whether the liberal-conservative separation was absent from other initiatives and the other races for political office. A tabulation of voters' responses recorded on the actual punch card ballots clearly showed that voters remained ideologically consistent in their responses to a series of ideologically divisive initiative measures and to contrasting candidates vying in nonpartisan races for the State's high bench. If this research is indicative of voter behavior generally, then a high percentage of voters do base their decisions on distinctions in judicial philosophy likely to be manifest in court management decisions and sentencing. 3 tables and 37 references
Main Term(s): Court personnel
Index Term(s): Judge selection; Judicial elections; Oregon
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=149571

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.