skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149594 Find in a Library
Title: Suspect Population and DNA Identification
Journal: Jurimetrics  Volume:34  Issue:1  Dated:(Fall 1993)  Pages:1-8
Author(s): R Lempert
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 8
Type: Training (Aid/Material)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines the implications of the biological characteristics of the suspect population for DNA identification procedures.
Abstract: Forensic DNA analysis typically proceeds by first determining whether alleles (one of two or more alternative forms of a gene) found in DNA apparently left by the perpetrator of a crime at a crime scene (the "evidence sample") match alleles extracted from a sample of the suspected criminal's blood (the "suspect sample"). If alleles drawn from the two sources match, the next step is to provide information about the probative value of the match by estimating the probability that alleles extracted from the blood of some random individual would have matched the alleles in the evidence sample. Thinking in terms of suspect populations reveals that often there is little reason to be concerned that a defendant's ethnic group is poorly represented in a laboratory population database; however, when a defendant's close relatives are members of the suspect population, statistics based on applying the product rule to allele frequencies taken from a laboratory's population database will be misleadingly low. Until DNA databases come on line, a substantial amount of non-DNA evidence ordinarily will link to the crime a defendant whose DNA is tested. This evidence, which is unlikely to similarly implicate other members of the suspect population, is often essential for concluding that a defendant with DNA matching the evidence DNA is uniquely linked to the crime. When the non-DNA evidence is strong, neither population substructures nor the presence of relatives is likely to create a large risk of injustice. Where the non-DNA evidence is weak or where that evidence would as strongly implicate related others, as an identification based on appearance and accent might, the cautions mentioned in this article are essential if the DNA evidence is to be given its proper weight and justice to be done. 12 footnotes
Main Term(s): Police crime analysis training
Index Term(s): Blood/body fluid analysis; DNA fingerprinting; Investigative techniques; Science and Technology; Suspect identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.