skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149596 Find in a Library
Title: DNA, Science and the Law: Two Cheers for the Ceiling Principle
Journal: Jurimetrics  Volume:34  Issue:1  Dated:(Fall 1993)  Pages:41-57
Author(s): R Lempert
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 17
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines the benefits and limitations of the National Research Council's recommendation that the "ceiling principle" be used in assessing the statistical implications of DNA matches.
Abstract: The ceiling principle is an intentionally conservative way of estimating the frequency with which individuals who share particular alleles appear in the general population. It establishes frequencies for each allele by taking random samples of 100 individuals from each of 15 to 20 populations and using the largest frequency with which the allele is found in any of these populations or 5 percent, whichever is larger, as an estimate of the allele's frequency in the population of interest. These frequencies are then multiplied to yield an estimate of the likelihood that a randomly selected person would exhibit the same allelic configuration as that which characterizes samples of DNA associated with the defendant and with some crime. The ceiling principle blends scientific and value considerations; the blend of the two is what makes the ceiling principle vulnerable to scientific criticism. It is also what makes it an arguably more attractive forensic approach than current product-rule procedures. The core value that motivated the National Research Council's recommendation of the "ceiling principle" was its sense that the calculation of random match probabilities should be conservative, such that any errors in the random match probability should overestimate rather than underestimate the probability that someone other than the defendant left the DNA evidence. 41 footnotes
Main Term(s): Science and Technology
Index Term(s): Court procedures; DNA fingerprinting; Police policies and procedures; Rules of evidence
Note: A version of this article was presented at the Second International Conference on Forensic Statistics, Tempe, Arizona, March 1993.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.