skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149770 Find in a Library
Title: Illegal Investigatory Stop: Effect of Suspect's Voluntary Admission - When Does Good Faith Defense Apply?
Journal: Crime to Court Police Officer's Handbook  Dated:(July 1994)  Pages:complete issue
Author(s): J C Coleman
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 21
Type: Training (Aid/Material)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This booklet provides the appellate court decision and legal commentary on United States v. O'Neal (1994), which involved legal issues pursuant to the seizure of a suspect's luggage; information is also provided on the symptoms of a grand mal epileptic seizure.
Abstract: The relevant facts of the case are that O'Neal and his brother arrived in Minneapolis on a bus from Chicago. Police officers watching the bus depot for possible drug couriers approached the men and questioned them. During the interrogation, one of the officers seized O'Neal's carry-on bag to submit it to a canine sniff test. As that officer left with the bag, another officer asked O'Neal whether the bag contained drugs; O'Neal admitted that it did. After the dog alerted to the bag, O'Neal was arrested, read his Miranda rights, and taken to the police station. The police obtained a search warrant for the bag, and upon execution of the warrant found the cocaine. Under the court's decision, an investigatory stop of a citizen may not be based solely on a "drug profile." Other facts to support reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed must also be present. Without at least a reasonable suspicion, an officer may not forcibly detain a person or seize his/her luggage. A magistrate can find probable cause for the issuance of a valid warrant even after an illegal investigatory stop, if there are sufficient facts not based upon information acquired as a result of the illegal seizure. The voluntary statement from the suspect that his luggage contained drugs was a valid basis for the issuance of the search warrant. There are cases in which a seizure or search pursuant to an invalid warrant may be held to be lawful. A test on the information is provided.
Main Term(s): Police legal training
Index Term(s): Detention; Drug offender profiles; Epilepsy; Reasonable suspicion; Search and seizure; Stop and frisk
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.