skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 149934 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: In Fairness and Mercy: Statutory Mitigating Factors in Capital Punishment Laws
Journal: Criminal Law Bulletin  Volume:30  Issue:4  Dated:(July-August 1994)  Pages:299-345
Author(s): J R Acker; C S Lanier
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 47
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of statutory mitigating factors in capital punishment laws focuses on the relevance of mitigating evidence to the offenders culpability, future dangerous, and general deserts.
Abstract: The paper is the sixth in a series on death penalty legislation. The discussion also focuses on the apparent tension between the Eighth Amendment principles of nonarbitrariness and the individualization that surrounds openended admission of mitigation evidence in capital sentencing trials. It also notes that the Model Penal Code lists eight separate mitigating factors. State laws include factors such as the absence of significant criminal history, extreme mental or emotional disturbance, victim participation or consent, defendant's belief in moral justification or extenuation, defendant's minor participation as accomplice, action under duress or domination of another, imperfect insanity and intoxication, the defendant's age, and other circumstances not recognized under the Model Penal Code. The laws of five States do not specify any mitigating factors, although they specify aggravating factors. Controversy now exists among the United States Supreme Court justices over whether and how individualized sentencing in capital cases, based on mitigating factors, can be reconciled with the Eighth Amendment imperative of nonarbitrary sentencing in capital trials. Footnotes
Main Term(s): State courts
Index Term(s): Model penal code; Sentencing factors; Sentencing guidelines; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.