skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 150150 Find in a Library
Title: Analysis of a Guideline Case as Applied to the Offence of Rape
Journal: Howard Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:33  Issue:3  Dated:(August 1994)  Pages:203-217
Author(s): R Ranyard; B Hebenton; K Pease
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 15
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study provides a cognitive-psychological perspective on one significant sentencing guideline judgment, the British case of Regina v. Billam and Others (1986), which concerns the sentencing of rapists.
Abstract: In England and Wales, the principal formal sources of sentencing practice are legislation and prior judicial decisions. The authors analyze "Billam's internal logic, the kind of sentencing practice prescribed, and how the guideline is being applied. The "Billam" sentencing guideline judgment specifies aggravating factors in rape: additional violence, weapon used, repeated rape, careful planning, previous convictions, further sexual indignities or perversions, very old or very young victim, and serious mental or physical effect on the victim. Mitigating factors specified are a guilty plea, victim behaved in a manner designed to lead the defendant to believe she would consent, and the defendant's previous good character. Irrelevant factors are imprudent victim behavior, and the victim's previous sexual experience. To examine how the "Billam" decision has been applied in subsequent rape cases, cases were selected at random from those reported in Thomas's (1992) "Current Sentencing Practice." The authors conclude that in appealed rape cases the Court of Appeal apparently has scaled its sentence without reference to "Billam" scaling implications. 4 tables, 14 references, and a table of cases
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Appellate courts; Foreign sentencing; Rapists; Sentencing factors; Sexual assault victims
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=150150

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.