skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 151190 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Program Evaluation: Kentucky's Parole System
Corporate Author: Kentucky Legislative Research Cmssn
United States of America
Project Director: S M Burton
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 163
Sponsoring Agency: Kentucky Legislative Research Cmssn
Frankfort, KY 40601
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This is the final report and recommendations of a study of Kentucky's parole system by the Program Review and Investigations Committee.
Abstract: Researchers obtained data and information by literature, record, and document reviews; interviews with current and former Parole Board members, applicants for Parole Board membership, Corrections officials and staff, representatives of the judiciary and law enforcement, advocates of victim's rights organizations, and parole officials from other States or professional organizations; and surveys of probation and parole officers. The study found that at each point in the parole decisionmaking process, discretionary decisionmaking authority provides the entities involved with the flexibility necessary to make individual case decisions based on the facts and circumstances of particular cases and to respond to overall goals of the State's criminal justice system. Still, in some cases broad discretion allowed in the parole system is unstructured and unchecked. Also, the degree of accountability to which various entities in the parole system, and the system itself, are held is questionable. The study makes several recommendations intended to add structure to decisionmaking processes and accountability in the system. One such recommendation is that discretionary decisions by the Parole Board in selecting and applying parole release criteria, and by the Corrections Cabinet in establishing postrelease supervisory criteria, be controlled through the use of guidelines and valid risk assessment tools. Another recommendation is that parole release decisions and revocation decisions be documented more fully and that the Corrections Cabinet improve its monitoring and oversight of parole officers' decisions during postrelease supervision. Also recommended is that communication and coordination of postrelease resources by the Parole Board, the Corrections Cabinet, parole officers, and the providers of community-based services be enhanced and that qualifications and nomination and selection procedures for Parole Board members be better defined and documented. 21 tables, 1 chart, and appended supplementary information
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Kentucky; Parole board discretion; Parole eligibility; Parole hearing; Parole supervision; Parole violations
Note: Research Report No. 257.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.