skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 152363 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluating Jail Reform: Inmate Infractions and Disciplinary Response in a Traditional and a Podular/Direct Supervision Jail
Journal: American Jails  Dated:(September/October 1992)  Pages:14-23
Author(s): J D Senese; J Wilson; A O Evans; R Aguirre; D B Kalinich
Date Published: 1992
Page Count: 10
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined inmate rule violators in traditional and podular/direct supervision jails for two 6-month intervals within one county jail system.
Abstract: Particularly, this study examined two groups of inmate rule violators for a local correctional department that moved from a traditional linear jail to a podular/direct supervision facility. Only official rule violations are examined, given the lack of consistent or readily available information about informal processing. Two samples of all formal incident reports were taken. The findings show that for the traditional jail, a full range of inmate rule violations and responses are evident. The inmate rule violations and the official responses were, more or less, equally balanced for major, minor, and informational incidents; however, in the podular facility the majority of rule violations that were formally processed were major rule violations. In addition, the percentage reduction in the number of rule violations that were processed formally across the two jails was 36 percent. This analysis also shows a reduction in every type of inmate rule violation except threats, property theft, and inmate order problems. In addition, the study also shows that correctional officers were less likely to give warnings or reduce privileges for those incidents they believed important enough to write up formally. This study shows that correctional officers in the podular/direct supervision jail are writing up only the most serious rule violations. The study also concludes that presumptions about increased safety and reduced inmate problems in the podular/direct supervision facilities may be premature for some types of inmate behaviors. 8 references and 5 tables
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Architectural design; Direct supervision jails; Inmate discipline; Inmate misconduct
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.