skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 152491 Find in a Library
Title: Warrantless Police Examination of Exterior of Luggage on Common Carrier
Journal: Crime to Court, Police Officer's Handbook  Dated:(December 1994)  Pages:complete issue
Author(s): J C Coleman
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 22
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: These papers analyze the legal issues related to search and seizure law and police procedures in examining the outside of luggage on a bus or other common carrier, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. McDonald.
Abstract: The Court ruled that a police officer's rubbing, squeezing, manipulation, and sniffing the exterior of luggage in a luggage compartment in a common carrier in 1994 did not represent an unreasonable search or seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. The Court ruled that no reasonable expectation of privacy exists in the airspace surrounding luggage that is being transported on a common carrier. It distinguished between an individual's privacy interest in the interior and exterior of luggage. In addition, a person's privacy interest in the contents of personal luggage can be forfeited where the person abandons the luggage. Another article in this magazine explains the topics that a police officer should include in a report on an incident involving police use of force. Questions and answers, photographs, and case citations
Main Term(s): Police legal limitations
Index Term(s): Search and seizure laws; US Supreme Court decisions; Warrantless search
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.