skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 153413 Find in a Library
Title: Use and Admissibility of DNA Typing Evidence: Problems and Prospects for Its Future Place in New Jersey
Journal: Rutgers Law Journal  Volume:24  Issue:3  Dated:(Spring 1993)  Pages:847-882
Author(s): S Robins
Date Published: 1993
Page Count: 36
Type: Report (Technical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Even though DNA typing is simply one of several forensic tools that can be used in criminal proceedings, speculation and criticism has surrounded DNA evidence.
Abstract: A match of DNA specimens provides only an inference. Depending on the quality of statistics presented and the number of genetic probes used, this inference can be weak or strong. An absolute identification using DNA technology requires the use of literally thousands of different probes in testing and comparison to account for all possible polymorphic sites in human DNA. From scientific and clinical perspectives, DNA technology is constantly scrutinized to assure compliance with accepted practices and procedures. Such scrutiny lends confidence in DNA testing, confidence that extends beyond the technology itself. Commercial DNA testing, however, lacks the same procedural safeguards to guarantee the accuracy of DNA typing techniques. The author criticizes DNA typing, particularly the need to standardize testing procedures and quality control, but does not conclude that DNA evidence cannot be used. The technology of DNA typing is described, and standards for the admission of DNA typing evidence are discussed. 165 footnotes
Main Term(s): Science and Technology
Index Term(s): Blood/body fluid analysis; Courts; Criminal proceedings; DNA fingerprinting; Evidence identification; Forensic sciences; Rules of evidence
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=153413

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.