Stay Informed Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.
NCJRS Abstract
The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library . See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.
NCJ Number: 153623
Title: Judged Seriousness of Crime in New Zealand
Journal: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology Volume:27 Issue:3 Dated:(December 1994) Pages:250-263
Author(s): S A B Davis; S Kemp
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 14
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: A total of 115 Christchurch (New Zealand) residents appraised the seriousness of 25 crimes, identified either by labels or vignettes, using the method of magnitude estimation.
Abstract: One aim of the study was to examine how the public estimates the seriousness of offenses related to the sentences prescribed in New Zealand law and the actual sentences given by the courts. There is also a related issue of how the public estimates relate to the priorities given by the police to clearing different crimes. Additionally, the researchers wanted to determine whether there was a social consensus on the relative seriousness of crimes in Christchurch. The sample contained 61 women and 54 men. The questionnaire was divided into five sections, the first of which stated the theme of the research and requested basic demographic information for use in the assessment of consensus. The age, sex, and occupation of the respondents were requested. The second section consisted of a training exercise in magnitude estimation. The third and fourth sections of the questionnaire asked respondents to estimate the seriousness of 25 crimes. Subjects responded to each crime both as a label and as a vignette. The fifth section of the questionnaire consisted of Taylor's (1968) Criminal Attitude Scale, which was originally designed to measure the degree of criminality of New Zealand offenders and measure their attitude toward authority and the possibility that offenders can be rehabilitated. Subjects' judgements on the labels and vignettes were highly correlated, and overall the results show a social consensus on the relative seriousness of the crimes. The median estimates were highly correlated with the average sentences imposed by New Zealand courts and moderately correlated with the maximum sentences prescribed by legislation and police clearance priorities. 1 table, 3 figures, and 34 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Crime seriousness measures; Foreign criminal justice research; New Zealand; Public Attitudes/Opinion
To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=153623
*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback .
. A title search of 